Chevrolet Suburban 1992 vs Ford Excursion 1999
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 7.4 Petrol | 7.3 Diesel | |
Petrol engines (Chevrolet Suburban) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Ford Excursion) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 294 HP | 250 HP | |
Torque: | 558 NM | 576 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 11 seconds | |
Chevrolet Suburban is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Suburban engine produces 44 HP more power than Ford Excursion, but torque is 18 NM less than Ford Excursion. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Suburban reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | no data | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 159 litres | 167 litres | |
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.59 m | 5.76 m | |
Width: | 1.96 m | 2.03 m | |
Height: | 1.90 m | 1.94 m | |
Chevrolet Suburban is smaller. Chevrolet Suburban is 17 cm shorter than the Ford Excursion, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Suburban is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 1359 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 4146 litres | |
Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 3`651 | 4`173 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 8000 | 11 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Suburban has
|
| |