Chevrolet Suburban 1992 vs Ford Excursion 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 6.5 Diesel | 5.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 194 HP | 325 HP | |
| Torque: | 583 NM | 745 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chevrolet Suburban engine produces 131 HP less power than Ford Excursion, whereas torque is 162 NM less than Ford Excursion. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 15.0 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 159 litres | 167 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.59 m | 5.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.96 m | 2.03 m | |
| Height: | 1.90 m | 2.03 m | |
|
Chevrolet Suburban is smaller. Chevrolet Suburban is 17 cm shorter than the Ford Excursion, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Suburban is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1359 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 4145 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 3`901 kg | 4`173 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`570 kg | 3`595 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 1`331 kg | 578 kg | |
| Chevrolet Suburban load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 57 procentiem more than Ford Excursion. Therefore, Chevrolet Suburban is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 16 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Suburban has
|
Ford Excursion has
| |