Chevrolet Suburban 2006 vs Toyota Tundra 2008

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Chevrolet Suburban
2006 - 2014
Toyota Tundra
2008 - 2013
Gearbox: Automatic Automatic
Engines: 5.3 - 6.04.0 - 5.7

Performance

Power: 324 - 366 HP236 - 386 HP
Torque: 470 - 510 NM361 - 544 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds6.2 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 12.9 - 13.213.1 - 15.3
Chevrolet Suburban petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Tundra.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Ground clearance: 227 mm (8.9 inches)259 - 264 mm (10.2 - 10.4 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Toyota Tundra can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Dimensions

Length: 5.65 m5.81 m
Width: 2.01 m2.03 m
Height: 1.95 m1.94 m
Chevrolet Suburban is smaller, but slightly higher.
Chevrolet Suburban is 16 cm shorter than the Toyota Tundra, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Suburban is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 1297 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
3890 litresno data
Turning diameter: 13.1 meters13.6 meters
The turning circle of the Chevrolet Suburban is 0.5 metres less than that of the Toyota Tundra, which means Chevrolet Suburban can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 3`239~ 3`085
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 780020 400
Pros and Cons: Chevrolet Suburban has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Toyota Tundra has
  • higher ground clearance
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv