Chevrolet Suburban 2006 vs Toyota Tundra 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 5.3 - 6.0 | 4.0 - 5.7 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 324 - 366 HP | 236 - 386 HP | |
Torque: | 470 - 510 NM | 361 - 544 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.2 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.9 - 13.2 | 13.1 - 15.3 | |
Chevrolet Suburban petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Tundra. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Ground clearance: | 227 mm (8.9 inches) | 259 - 264 mm (10.2 - 10.4 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Toyota Tundra can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.65 m | 5.81 m | |
Width: | 2.01 m | 2.03 m | |
Height: | 1.95 m | 1.94 m | |
Chevrolet Suburban is smaller, but slightly higher. Chevrolet Suburban is 16 cm shorter than the Toyota Tundra, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Suburban is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 1297 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3890 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 13.1 meters | 13.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chevrolet Suburban is 0.5 metres less than that of the Toyota Tundra, which means Chevrolet Suburban can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`239 | ~ 3`085 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 7800 | 20 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Suburban has
|
Toyota Tundra has
| |