Chevrolet Suburban 2006 vs Ford F150 2014
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 5.3 - 6.0 | 2.7 - 4.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 324 - 366 HP | 282 - 385 HP | |
| Torque: | 470 - 510 NM | 343 - 570 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.9 - 13.2 | 10.7 - 13.8 | |
|
Chevrolet Suburban petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford F150. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.65 m | 5.89 m | |
| Width: | 2.01 m | 2.03 m | |
| Height: | 1.95 m | 1.92 m | |
|
Chevrolet Suburban is smaller, but slightly higher. Chevrolet Suburban is 24 cm shorter than the Ford F150, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Suburban is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1297 litres | 1495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3890 litres | 2200 litres | |
| Chevrolet Suburban has 198 litres less trunk space than the Ford F150. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Suburban (by 1690 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 13.1 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`239 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 26 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford F150 has
| |