Chevrolet Suburban 2006 vs Chevrolet Suburban 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 5.3 - 6.0 | 5.3 - 8.1 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 324 - 366 HP | 290 - 345 HP | |
| Torque: | 470 - 510 NM | 441 - 617 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.9 - 13.2 | no data | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 227 mm (8.9 inches) | 220 mm (8.7 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.65 m | 5.57 m | |
| Width: | 2.01 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.95 m | 1.96 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Suburban 2006 is 8 cm longer than the Chevrolet Suburban 2000, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1297 litres | 1295 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
3890 litres | 3726 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.1 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | ~ 3`239 kg | ~ 3`678 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 2`638 kg | ~ 2`551 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 601 kg | ~ 1`127 kg | |
| Chevrolet Suburban 2006 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is almost two times less than Chevrolet Suburban 2000. Therefore, Chevrolet Suburban 2000 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Suburban has
|
Chevrolet Suburban has
| |