Chevrolet Spark 2018 vs Skoda Citigo 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 98 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 NM | 95 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 14.4 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Spark engine produces 38 HP more power than Skoda Citigo, whereas torque is 32 NM more than Skoda Citigo. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 4.1 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 34 litres | 35 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.64 m | 3.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
| Chevrolet Spark is 7 cm longer than the Skoda Citigo, 5 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 314 litres | 251 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
770 litres | 959 litres | |
| Chevrolet Spark has 63 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Citigo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Citigo (by 189 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Spark is 0.5 metres more than that of the Skoda Citigo, which means Chevrolet Spark can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 1`290 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Spark has
|
| |