Chevrolet Spark 2015 vs Volkswagen Up! 2016

 
Chevrolet Spark
2015 -
Volkswagen Up!
2016 -
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 98 HP75 HP
Torque: 127 NM95 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds14.9 seconds
Chevrolet Spark engine produces 23 HP more power than Volkswagen Up!, whereas torque is 32 NM more than Volkswagen Up!.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.14.2
The Volkswagen Up! is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Chevrolet Spark consumes 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Up!, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Spark could require 435 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 34 litres35 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 470 km in combined cycle830 km in combined cycle
470 km on highway920 km on highway
Volkswagen Up! gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.64 m3.60 m
Width: 1.60 m1.64 m
Height: 1.48 m1.50 m
Chevrolet Spark is 4 cm longer than the Volkswagen Up!, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Spark is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 313 litres251 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
771 litresno data
Chevrolet Spark has more luggage capacity.
Chevrolet Spark has 62 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Up!.
Turning diameter: 9.5 meters9.8 meters
The turning circle of the Chevrolet Spark is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Up!.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`330
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

below average
Volkswagen Up! has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Spark has serious deffects in 280 percent more cases than Volkswagen Up!, so Volkswagen Up! quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): no data6600
Pros and Cons: Chevrolet Spark has
  • more power
  • roomier boot
Volkswagen Up! has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv