Chevrolet Spark 2015 vs Toyota Aygo 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 98 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 NM | 93 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 14.9 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Spark engine produces 30 HP more power than Toyota Aygo, whereas torque is 34 NM more than Toyota Aygo. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 3.8 | |
|
The Toyota Aygo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Spark consumes 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Aygo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Spark could require 495 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 34 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 470 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 470 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Aygo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chevrolet Spark engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 21 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Yaris, Citroen C1, Peugeot 107, Peugeot 108 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Aygo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Chevrolet Spark engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota Aygo 2005 1.0 engine: Engine often vibrates and has difficulty starting in cold weather. Timing chain lifetime is not very long. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.64 m | 3.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.62 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.46 m | |
| Chevrolet Spark is 23 cm longer than the Toyota Aygo, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Spark is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 313 litres | 139 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
771 litres | 751 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Spark has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Spark has 174 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Aygo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Spark (by 20 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.5 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Spark is 0.1 metres more than that of the Toyota Aygo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`160 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | Chevrolet Spark has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota Aygo has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Chevrolet Spark, so Chevrolet Spark quality is probably better | ||
| Average price (€): | no data | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Spark has
|
Toyota Aygo has
| |