Chevrolet Spark 2013 vs Skoda Citigo 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 93 NM | 95 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.5 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
|
Skoda Citigo is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Spark engine produces 7 HP less power than Skoda Citigo, whereas torque is 2 NM less than Skoda Citigo. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Spark reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.9 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Citigo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Spark consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Citigo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Spark could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Spark consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Citigo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 590 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Citigo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.64 m | 3.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.46 m | |
| Chevrolet Spark is 8 cm longer than the Skoda Citigo, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Spark is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 170 litres | 251 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
873 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Citigo has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Spark has 81 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Citigo. This could mean that the Chevrolet Spark uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Spark is 0.2 metres more than that of the Skoda Citigo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`355 | 1`290 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Skoda Citigo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Spark has serious deffects in 175 percent more cases than Skoda Citigo, so Skoda Citigo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Spark has
|
Skoda Citigo has
| |