Chevrolet Spark 2013 vs Opel Karl 2015

 
Chevrolet Spark
2013 - 2015
Opel Karl
2015 - 2018
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.0 Petrol1.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 68 HP75 HP
Torque: 93 NM96 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 15.5 seconds13.9 seconds
Opel Karl is a more dynamic driving.
Chevrolet Spark engine produces 7 HP less power than Opel Karl, whereas torque is 3 NM less than Opel Karl. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Spark reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.14.5
Real fuel consumption: 5.9 l/100km5.8 l/100km
The Opel Karl is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Chevrolet Spark consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Karl, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Spark could require 90 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Spark consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Karl.
Fuel tank capacity: 35 litres32 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 680 km in combined cycle710 km in combined cycle
830 km on highway820 km on highway
590 km with real consumption550 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 3.64 m3.68 m
Width: 1.60 m1.60 m
Height: 1.52 m1.48 m
Chevrolet Spark is smaller, but higher.
Chevrolet Spark is 4 cm shorter than the Opel Karl, width is practically the same , while the height of Chevrolet Spark is 5 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 170 litres206 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
873 litres1013 litres
Opel Karl has more luggage space.
Chevrolet Spark has 36 litres less trunk space than the Opel Karl. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Karl (by 140 litres).
Turning diameter: 10 meters9.5 meters
The turning circle of the Chevrolet Spark is 0.5 metres more than that of the Opel Karl, which means Chevrolet Spark can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Power steering: Hydraulic power steeringElectric power steering
Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering.
Gross weight (kg): 1`3551`353
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

above average
Opel Karl has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Spark has serious deffects in 425 percent more cases than Opel Karl, so Opel Karl quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 2800no data
Pros and Cons: Chevrolet Spark has
  • hydraulic power steering
Opel Karl has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • electric power steering
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv