Chevrolet Spark 2010 vs Volkswagen Fox 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 81 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 111 NM | 124 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 13 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Spark is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Spark engine produces 6 HP more power than Volkswagen Fox, but torque is 13 NM less than Volkswagen Fox. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Spark reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Chevrolet Spark is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Spark consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Fox, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Spark over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Spark consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Fox. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Fox gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.64 m | 3.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.54 m | |
|
Chevrolet Spark is smaller. Chevrolet Spark is 19 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Fox, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Spark is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 170 litres | 260 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1016 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Fox has more luggage space. Chevrolet Spark has 90 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Fox. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Spark is 1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Fox, which means Chevrolet Spark can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`360 | 1`520 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Volkswagen Fox has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Chevrolet Spark, so Volkswagen Fox quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Spark has
|
Volkswagen Fox has
| |