Chevrolet Spark 2010 vs Skoda Citigo 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 81 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 111 NM | 95 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Spark is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Spark engine produces 6 HP more power than Skoda Citigo, whereas torque is 16 NM more than Skoda Citigo. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Spark reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Citigo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Spark consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Citigo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Spark could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Spark consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Citigo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Citigo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.64 m | 3.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.46 m | |
| Chevrolet Spark is 8 cm longer than the Skoda Citigo, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Spark is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 170 litres | 251 litres | |
|
Skoda Citigo has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Spark has 81 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Citigo. This could mean that the Chevrolet Spark uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Spark is 0.2 metres more than that of the Skoda Citigo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`360 | 1`290 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Skoda Citigo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Spark has serious deffects in 160 percent more cases than Skoda Citigo, so Skoda Citigo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Spark has
|
Skoda Citigo has
| |