Chevrolet Spark 2010 vs Toyota Aygo 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 93 NM | 93 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.5 seconds | 14.2 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Spark and Toyota Aygo have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Chevrolet Spark reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 3.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Aygo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Spark consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Aygo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Spark could require 195 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Spark consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Aygo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 570 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Aygo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chevrolet Spark engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 21 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Yaris, Citroen C1, Peugeot 107, Peugeot 108 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Aygo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota Aygo 2005 1.0 engine: Engine often vibrates and has difficulty starting in cold weather. Timing chain lifetime is not very long. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.64 m | 3.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.62 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.46 m | |
| Chevrolet Spark is 23 cm longer than the Toyota Aygo, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Spark is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 170 litres | 139 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 751 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Spark has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Spark has 31 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Aygo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Spark is 0.6 metres more than that of the Toyota Aygo, which means Chevrolet Spark can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`355 | 1`160 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Toyota Aygo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Spark has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Toyota Aygo, so Toyota Aygo quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Spark has
|
Toyota Aygo has
| |