Chevrolet Spark 2007 vs Toyota Aygo 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 0.8 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 52 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 69 NM | 93 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.6 seconds | 14.2 seconds | |
|
Toyota Aygo is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Spark engine produces 16 HP less power than Toyota Aygo, whereas torque is 24 NM less than Toyota Aygo. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Spark reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 3.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Aygo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Spark consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Aygo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Spark could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Spark consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Aygo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 38 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Aygo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Toyota Aygo 2005 1.0 engine: Engine often vibrates and has difficulty starting in cold weather. Timing chain lifetime is not very long. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.50 m | 3.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.50 m | 1.62 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.46 m | |
| Chevrolet Spark is 9 cm longer than the Toyota Aygo, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Spark is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 145 litres | 139 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
830 litres | 751 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Spark is 0.2 metres less than that of the Toyota Aygo. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`210 kg | 1`160 kg | |
| Net weight: | 776 kg | 790 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 434 kg | 370 kg | |
| Chevrolet Spark load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 15 procentiem more than Toyota Aygo. Therefore, Chevrolet Spark is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Toyota Aygo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Spark has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Toyota Aygo, so Toyota Aygo quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Spark has
|
Toyota Aygo has
| |