Chevrolet Spark 2005 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 1994
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 63 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 87 NM | 108 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 13 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Spark engine produces 12 HP less power than Mitsubishi Lancer, whereas torque is 21 NM less than Mitsubishi Lancer. Despite less power, Chevrolet Spark reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 7.0 | |
|
The Chevrolet Spark is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Spark consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Spark over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 38 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi Lancer gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.50 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.50 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Chevrolet Spark is smaller, but higher. Chevrolet Spark is 79 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Lancer, 19 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Spark is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 145 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
830 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Spark is 1 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means Chevrolet Spark can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`230 | 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Spark has
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has
| |