Chevrolet Spark 2005 vs Kia Picanto 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 0.8 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 51 HP | 62 HP | |
| Torque: | 69 NM | 86 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18.2 seconds | 16.3 seconds | |
|
Kia Picanto is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Spark engine produces 11 HP less power than Kia Picanto, whereas torque is 17 NM less than Kia Picanto. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Spark reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 5.1 | |
|
The Kia Picanto is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Spark consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Picanto, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Spark could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 38 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.50 m | 3.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.50 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Chevrolet Spark is smaller, but slightly higher. Chevrolet Spark and Kia Picanto are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 145 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
830 litres | 882 litres | |
|
Kia Picanto has more luggage space. Chevrolet Spark has 75 litres less trunk space than the Kia Picanto. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Picanto (by 52 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 9.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`210 | 1`340 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Kia Picanto has
| |