Chevrolet Spark 2018 vs Volkswagen Up! 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 | 1.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 98 HP | 60 - 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 NM | 95 - 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.9 - 15.3 seconds | |
| In general, Volkswagen Up! are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Chevrolet Spark. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 4.1 - 4.4 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.64 m | 3.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.50 m | |
| Chevrolet Spark is 4 cm longer than the Volkswagen Up!, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Spark is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 314 litres | 251 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
770 litres | 959 litres | |
| Chevrolet Spark has 63 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Up!. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Up! (by 189 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Spark is 0.5 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Up!, which means Chevrolet Spark can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | ~ 1`336 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Spark has
|
Volkswagen Up! has
| |