Chevrolet Spark 2015 vs Volkswagen Up! 2016

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Chevrolet Spark
2015 -
Volkswagen Up!
2016 - 2019
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.41.0

Performance

Power: 98 HP60 - 90 HP
Torque: 127 NM95 - 160 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds9.9 - 15.3 seconds
In general, Volkswagen Up! are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Chevrolet Spark. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.14.1 - 4.4
Chevrolet Spark petrol engines consumes on average 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Up!.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 3.64 m3.60 m
Width: 1.60 m1.64 m
Height: 1.48 m1.50 m
Chevrolet Spark is 4 cm longer than the Volkswagen Up!, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Spark is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 313 litres251 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
771 litres959 litres
Chevrolet Spark has 62 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Up!. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Up! (by 188 litres).
Turning diameter: 9.5 meters9.8 meters
The turning circle of the Chevrolet Spark is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Up!.
Gross weight: no data~ 1`336 kg
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

average
Average price (€): no data7600
Pros and Cons: Chevrolet Spark has
  • roomier boot
Volkswagen Up! has
  • more powerful and dynamic engines
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv