Chevrolet Spark 2013 vs Suzuki Alto 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chevrolet Spark is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Suzuki Alto has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.2 | 1.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 81 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 93 - 111 NM | 90 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 - 15.5 seconds | 14 - 17 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 4.4 - 5.2 | |
|
Chevrolet Spark petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Suzuki Alto. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.64 m | 3.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.47 m | |
| Chevrolet Spark is 14 cm longer than the Suzuki Alto, width is practically the same , while the height of Chevrolet Spark is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 170 litres | 129 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
873 litres | 774 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Spark has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Spark has 41 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Alto. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Spark (by 99 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Spark is 1 metres more than that of the Suzuki Alto, which means Chevrolet Spark can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`358 | ~ 1`250 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Spark has
|
Suzuki Alto has
| |