Chevrolet Spark 2010 vs Volkswagen Up! 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chevrolet Spark is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Volkswagen Up! has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.2 (petrol) | 1.0 (petrol, lPG) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 81 HP | 60 - 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 93 - 111 NM | 90 - 95 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 - 15.5 seconds | 13.2 - 16.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 4.4 - 4.7 | |
|
Chevrolet Spark petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Up!. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.64 m | 3.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.49 m | |
| Chevrolet Spark is 10 cm longer than the Volkswagen Up!, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Spark is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 170 litres | 251 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Up! has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Spark has 81 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Up!. This could mean that the Chevrolet Spark uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Spark is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Up!. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`358 | ~ 1`306 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Spark has
|
Volkswagen Up! has
| |