Chevrolet Spark 2010 vs Mazda 2 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.2 | 1.3 - 1.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 81 HP | 75 - 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 93 - 111 NM | 119 - 133 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 - 15.5 seconds | 10.4 - 14 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.1 - 5.8 | |
|
Chevrolet Spark petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 2. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.64 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Chevrolet Spark is smaller, but higher. Chevrolet Spark is 28 cm shorter than the Mazda 2, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Spark is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 170 litres | 250 litres | |
|
Mazda 2 has more luggage space. Chevrolet Spark has 80 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 2. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Spark is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda 2. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`358 | ~ 1`457 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Spark has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |