Chevrolet Spark 2010 vs Ford KA 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.2 (petrol) | 1.2 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 81 HP | 69 - 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 93 - 111 NM | 102 - 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 - 15.5 seconds | 13 - 13.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 4.2 - 5.1 | |
|
On average, the Chevrolet Spark petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Ford KA. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.64 m | 3.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.51 m | |
| Chevrolet Spark is 2 cm longer than the Ford KA, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Spark is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 170 litres | 224 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 710 litres | |
|
Ford KA has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Spark has 54 litres less trunk space than the Ford KA. This could mean that the Chevrolet Spark uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 9.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Spark is 0.7 metres more than that of the Ford KA, which means Chevrolet Spark can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`358 | ~ 1`368 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Spark has
|
Ford KA has
| |