Chevrolet Spark 2005 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 1994
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 0.8 - 1.0 (petrol) | 1.3 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Mitsubishi Lancer is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 51 - 63 HP | 68 - 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 69 - 87 NM | 108 - 167 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 - 18.2 seconds | 7.6 - 16.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 6.6 | 6.1 - 7.9 | |
|
Chevrolet Spark petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Lancer. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.50 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.50 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Chevrolet Spark is smaller, but higher. Chevrolet Spark is 79 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Lancer, 19 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Spark is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 145 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
830 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Spark is 1 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means Chevrolet Spark can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`217 | ~ 1`019 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Spark has
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has
| |