Chevrolet Spark 2005 vs Kia Picanto 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 0.8 - 1.0 (petrol) | 1.0 - 1.1 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 51 - 63 HP | 62 - 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 69 - 87 NM | 86 - 153 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 - 18.2 seconds | 15.1 - 17.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 6.6 | 4.2 - 5.8 | |
|
Chevrolet Spark petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Kia Picanto. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.50 m | 3.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.50 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Chevrolet Spark is smaller, but slightly higher. Chevrolet Spark and Kia Picanto are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 145 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
830 litres | 882 litres | |
|
Kia Picanto has more luggage space. Chevrolet Spark has 75 litres less trunk space than the Kia Picanto. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Picanto (by 52 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 9.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`217 | ~ 1`348 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Spark has
|
Kia Picanto has
| |