Chevrolet Orlando 2011 vs Volkswagen Touran 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 315 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Touran is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Orlando engine produces 10 HP less power than Volkswagen Touran, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Volkswagen Touran. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Orlando reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Touran is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Orlando consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touran, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Orlando could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Orlando consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touran. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1300 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Touran gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Volkswagen Touran 2010 2.0 engine: The engine is very durable and can last a long time with proper maintenance, and is also quite economical for its power. There may be some problems with the turbine geometry. It is important to use good ... More about Volkswagen Touran 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Chevrolet Orlando is larger, but lower. Chevrolet Orlando is 26 cm longer than the Volkswagen Touran, 8 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Orlando is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 458 litres | 695 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 458 litres | 121 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 695 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
458 litres | 1989 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Chevrolet Orlando has more luggage space (by 337 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Touran (by 1531 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Orlando is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Touran. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`287 | 2`190 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volkswagen Touran is better rated in child safety tests. The Volkswagen Touran scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Orlando has
|
Volkswagen Touran has
| |