Chevrolet Orlando 2011 vs Chevrolet Captiva 2007
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 127 HP | |
| Torque: | 315 NM | 295 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Orlando is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Orlando engine produces 3 HP more power than Chevrolet Captiva, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Chevrolet Captiva. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Orlando reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
|
The Chevrolet Orlando is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Orlando consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Captiva, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Orlando over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Orlando consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Captiva. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 1300 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Chevrolet Orlando gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Chevrolet Orlando is larger, but lower. Chevrolet Orlando is 1 cm longer than the Chevrolet Captiva, 3 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Orlando is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 458 litres | 465 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 458 litres | 465 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 465 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
458 litres | 930 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Chevrolet Captiva has more luggage space (by 7 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Captiva (by 472 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Orlando is 0.2 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Captiva. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`287 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Orlando has
|
Chevrolet Captiva has
| |