Chevrolet Orlando 2011 vs Renault Espace 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Orlando is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Orlando engine produces 13 HP more power than Renault Espace, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Renault Espace. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Orlando reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
By specification Chevrolet Orlando consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Espace, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Orlando over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Chevrolet Orlando consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Espace. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 83 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 1270 km in combined cycle | |
| 1300 km on highway | 1450 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 1030 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Espace gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Chevrolet Cruze | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Espace might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Espace 2010 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.73 m | |
| Chevrolet Orlando and Renault Espace are practically the same length. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 458 litres | 291 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 458 litres | 291 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
458 litres | 2860 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Chevrolet Orlando has more luggage space (by 167 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Espace (by 2402 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Orlando is 0.3 metres more than that of the Renault Espace. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`287 | 2`555 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Orlando has
|
Renault Espace has
| |