Chevrolet Orlando 2011 vs Mitsubishi Grandis 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Orlando is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Orlando engine produces 27 HP more power than Mitsubishi Grandis, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Mitsubishi Grandis. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Orlando reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Grandis is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Chevrolet Orlando consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Grandis, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Orlando over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Chevrolet Orlando consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Grandis. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km with real consumption | 890 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.66 m | |
| Chevrolet Orlando is 11 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Grandis, 8 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Orlando is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 458 litres | 320 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 458 litres | 320 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
458 litres | 1545 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Chevrolet Orlando has more luggage space (by 138 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Grandis (by 1087 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Orlando is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Grandis. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`287 | 2`340 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Orlando has
|
Mitsubishi Grandis has
| |