Chevrolet Orlando 2011 vs Kia Carens 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.7 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 330 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Orlando is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Orlando engine produces 27 HP more power than Kia Carens, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Kia Carens. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Orlando reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 4.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Kia Carens is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Orlando consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Carens, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Orlando could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Orlando consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Carens. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 1200 km in combined cycle | |
| 1300 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Kia Carens gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Chevrolet Cruze | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai i40, Hyundai ix35, Kia Optima | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Carens might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Chevrolet Orlando is larger. Chevrolet Orlando is 13 cm longer than the Kia Carens, 7 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Orlando is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 458 litres | 492 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 458 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 492 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
458 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Orlando is 0.5 metres more than that of the Kia Carens, which means Chevrolet Orlando can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`287 | 2`250 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Kia Carens scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Orlando has
|
Kia Carens has
| |