Chevrolet Orlando 2011 vs Ford S-Max 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Orlando is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Orlando engine produces 23 HP more power than Ford S-Max, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Ford S-Max. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Orlando reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 6.0 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
| 1300 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford S-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Ford S-Max engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Chevrolet Cruze | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Ford Mondeo, Ford Focus, Ford Galaxy, Ford C-Max | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Ford S-Max might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Chevrolet Orlando is smaller. Chevrolet Orlando is 12 cm shorter than the Ford S-Max, width is practically the same , while the height of Chevrolet Orlando is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 458 litres | 285 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 458 litres | 285 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
458 litres | 2000 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Chevrolet Orlando has more luggage space (by 173 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford S-Max (by 1542 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Orlando is 0.3 metres less than that of the Ford S-Max. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`287 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford S-Max is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Orlando has
|
Ford S-Max has
| |