Chevrolet Orlando 2011 vs Citroen C8 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 138 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Orlando is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Orlando engine produces 25 HP more power than Citroen C8, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Citroen C8. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Orlando reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
By specification Chevrolet Orlando consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C8, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Orlando over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Chevrolet Orlando consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C8. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| 1300 km on highway | 1330 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 1080 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen C8 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 520'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Citroen C8 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Chevrolet Cruze | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Peugeot 308, Peugeot 407, Citroen C5, Citroen C4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C8 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Citroen C8 2008 2.0 engine: The 2.0 HDI (DW10BTED4) engine is reliable and durable, with few issues in its mechanical components, but it does have some recurring problems. Early models featured a short camshaft timing chain that was prone to ... More about Citroen C8 2008 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.86 m | |
| Chevrolet Orlando is 7 cm shorter than the Citroen C8, 2 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Orlando is 22 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 458 litres | 480 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 458 litres | 480 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
458 litres | 2948 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Citroen C8 has more luggage space (by 22 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C8 (by 2490 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Orlando is 0.4 metres more than that of the Citroen C8, which means Chevrolet Orlando can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`287 | 2`530 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Orlando has
|
Citroen C8 has
| |