Chevrolet Orlando 2011 vs Mazda 5 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 141 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 176 NM | 165 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Orlando is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Orlando engine produces 26 HP more power than Mazda 5, whereas torque is 11 NM more than Mazda 5. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Orlando reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.4 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Orlando consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Orlando could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Orlando consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Chevrolet Orlando is larger. Chevrolet Orlando is 7 cm longer than the Mazda 5, 13 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Orlando is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 458 litres | 112 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 458 litres | 112 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1499 litres | 1597 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Chevrolet Orlando has more luggage space (by 346 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 5 (by 98 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Orlando is 0.7 metres more than that of the Mazda 5, which means Chevrolet Orlando can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`170 kg | 2`085 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`539 kg | 1`395 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 631 kg | 690 kg | |
| Chevrolet Orlando load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 9 procentiem less than Mazda 5. Therefore, Mazda 5 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Orlando has
|
Mazda 5 has
| |