Chevrolet Orlando 2011 vs Ford Galaxy 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 141 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 176 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Ford Galaxy is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Orlando engine produces 19 HP less power than Ford Galaxy, whereas torque is 64 NM less than Ford Galaxy. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Orlando reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.7 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km | |
|
The Chevrolet Orlando is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Chevrolet Orlando consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Orlando could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Chevrolet Orlando consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 1080 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Galaxy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chevrolet Orlando engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Chevrolet Cruze | Used also on Ford S-Max | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chevrolet Orlando might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Chevrolet Orlando is smaller. Chevrolet Orlando is 17 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, width is practically the same , while the height of Chevrolet Orlando is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 458 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 458 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
458 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Orlando is 0.6 metres less than that of the Ford Galaxy, which means Chevrolet Orlando can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`160 | 2`460 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Galaxy is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 10 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Orlando has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |