Chevrolet Orlando 2011 vs Mazda 5 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 141 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 176 NM | 165 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Orlando is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Orlando engine produces 26 HP more power than Mazda 5, whereas torque is 11 NM more than Mazda 5. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Orlando reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.7 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
|
By specification Chevrolet Orlando consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Orlando could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Orlando consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1080 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Chevrolet Orlando is larger. Chevrolet Orlando is 7 cm longer than the Mazda 5, 13 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Orlando is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 458 litres | 112 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 458 litres | 112 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
458 litres | 1597 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Chevrolet Orlando has more luggage space (by 346 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 5 (by 1139 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Orlando is 0.7 metres more than that of the Mazda 5, which means Chevrolet Orlando can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`160 | 2`085 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Orlando has
|
Mazda 5 has
| |