Chevrolet Orlando 2011 vs Chevrolet Captiva 2007
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 141 HP | 127 HP | |
| Torque: | 176 NM | 295 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Orlando is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Orlando engine produces 14 HP more power than Chevrolet Captiva, but torque is 119 NM less than Chevrolet Captiva. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Orlando reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.7 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
|
The Chevrolet Orlando is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Orlando consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Captiva, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Orlando over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Orlando consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Captiva. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 1080 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chevrolet Captiva engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Chevrolet Cruze | Used also on Chevrolet Lacetti | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chevrolet Orlando might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Chevrolet Captiva engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Chevrolet Orlando is larger, but lower. Chevrolet Orlando is 1 cm longer than the Chevrolet Captiva, 3 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Orlando is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 458 litres | 465 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 458 litres | 465 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 465 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
458 litres | 930 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Chevrolet Captiva has more luggage space (by 7 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Captiva (by 472 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Orlando is 0.2 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Captiva. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`160 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Orlando has
|
Chevrolet Captiva has
| |