Chevrolet Orlando 2013 vs Volkswagen Touran 2010
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 140 HP | 140 HP | |
Torque: | 200 NM | 220 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
Volkswagen Touran is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Orlando and Volkswagen Touran have the same engine power, but Chevrolet Orlando torque is 20 NM less than Volkswagen Touran. Chevrolet Orlando reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 6.8 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
The Volkswagen Touran is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Chevrolet Orlando consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touran, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Orlando over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Chevrolet Orlando consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touran. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
1180 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
710 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.65 m | 4.40 m | |
Width: | 1.88 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.63 m | 1.67 m | |
Chevrolet Orlando is larger, but lower. Chevrolet Orlando is 26 cm longer than the Volkswagen Touran, 8 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Orlando is 4 cm lower. | |||
Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
Trunk capacity: | 458 litres | 695 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 458 litres | 121 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 695 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
466 litres | 1989 litres | |
In 7-seat version Chevrolet Orlando has more luggage space (by 337 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Touran (by 1523 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chevrolet Orlando is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Touran. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`179 | 2`130 | |
Safety: | |||
Volkswagen Touran is better rated in child safety tests. The Volkswagen Touran scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 5000 | 6400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Orlando has
|
Volkswagen Touran has
| |