Chevrolet Orlando 2013 vs Volkswagen Touran 2010

 
Chevrolet Orlando
2013 - 2018
Volkswagen Touran
2010 - 2015
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 140 HP140 HP
Torque: 200 NM220 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11 seconds9.5 seconds
Volkswagen Touran is a more dynamic driving.
Chevrolet Orlando and Volkswagen Touran have the same engine power, but Chevrolet Orlando torque is 20 NM less than Volkswagen Touran. Chevrolet Orlando reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.26.8
Real fuel consumption: 8.9 l/100km8.2 l/100km
The Volkswagen Touran is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise.
By specification Chevrolet Orlando consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touran, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Orlando over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Chevrolet Orlando consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touran.
Fuel tank capacity: 64 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1030 km in combined cycle880 km in combined cycle
1180 km on highway1090 km on highway
710 km with real consumption730 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.65 m4.40 m
Width: 1.88 m1.79 m
Height: 1.63 m1.67 m
Chevrolet Orlando is larger, but lower.
Chevrolet Orlando is 26 cm longer than the Volkswagen Touran, 8 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Orlando is 4 cm lower.
Seats: 7 seats5 seats
Trunk capacity: 458 litres695 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: 458 litres121 litres
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: no data695 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
466 litres1989 litres
In 7-seat version Chevrolet Orlando has more luggage space (by 337 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Touran (by 1523 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.3 meters11.2 meters
The turning circle of the Chevrolet Orlando is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Touran.
Gross weight (kg): 2`1792`130
Safety:
Volkswagen Touran is better rated in child safety tests. The Volkswagen Touran scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 60007000
Pros and Cons: Chevrolet Orlando has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Volkswagen Touran has
  • more dynamic
  • higher children safety
  • better safety assist technologies
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv