Chevrolet Orlando 2013 vs Ford Galaxy 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Ford Galaxy is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Orlando engine produces 20 HP less power than Ford Galaxy, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Ford Galaxy. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Orlando reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km | |
|
The Chevrolet Orlando is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Orlando consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Orlando over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Orlando consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Chevrolet Orlando is smaller. Chevrolet Orlando is 17 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, width is practically the same , while the height of Chevrolet Orlando is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 458 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 458 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
466 litres | 2325 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Chevrolet Orlando has more luggage space (by 68 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Galaxy (by 1859 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Orlando is 0.6 metres less than that of the Ford Galaxy, which means Chevrolet Orlando can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`179 kg | 2`460 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`539 kg | 1`659 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 640 kg | 801 kg | |
| Chevrolet Orlando load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 25 procentiem less than Ford Galaxy. Therefore, Ford Galaxy is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Galaxy is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Orlando has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |