Chevrolet Orlando 2013 vs Mazda 5 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 165 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Orlando is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Orlando engine produces 25 HP more power than Mazda 5, whereas torque is 35 NM more than Mazda 5. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Orlando reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
|
By specification Chevrolet Orlando consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 5, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Orlando over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Chevrolet Orlando consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Chevrolet Orlando gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Chevrolet Orlando is larger. Chevrolet Orlando is 7 cm longer than the Mazda 5, 13 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Orlando is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 458 litres | 112 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 458 litres | 112 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
466 litres | 1597 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Chevrolet Orlando has more luggage space (by 346 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 5 (by 1131 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Orlando is 0.7 metres more than that of the Mazda 5, which means Chevrolet Orlando can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`179 | 2`085 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Orlando has
|
Mazda 5 has
| |