Chevrolet Orlando 2011 vs Volkswagen Touran 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.2 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 - 163 HP | 90 - 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 176 - 360 NM | 175 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 - 11.6 seconds | 8.5 - 14.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 - 7.9 | 4.6 - 6.8 | |
|
Chevrolet Orlando petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Touran. On average, Chevrolet Orlando equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touran. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Chevrolet Orlando is larger, but lower. Chevrolet Orlando is 26 cm longer than the Volkswagen Touran, 8 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Orlando is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 458 litres | 695 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1499 litres | 1989 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Touran has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Orlando has 237 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Touran. This could mean that the Chevrolet Orlando uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Touran (by 490 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Orlando is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Touran. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`228 | ~ 2`177 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volkswagen Touran is better rated in child safety tests. The Volkswagen Touran scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Orlando has
|
Volkswagen Touran has
| |