Chevrolet Orlando 2011 vs Subaru Forester 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Chevrolet Orlando is available with front wheel drive, while Subaru Forester can be equipped with four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 - 163 HP | 147 - 230 HP | |
| Torque: | 176 - 360 NM | 196 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 - 11.6 seconds | 6 - 12.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 - 7.9 | 6.3 - 11.0 | |
|
Chevrolet Orlando petrol engines consumes on average 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Subaru Forester. On average, Chevrolet Orlando equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Chevrolet Orlando is larger, but lower. Chevrolet Orlando is 9 cm longer than the Subaru Forester, 10 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Orlando is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 458 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1499 litres | no data | |
| Chevrolet Orlando has 8 litres more trunk space than the Subaru Forester. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Orlando is 0.3 metres more than that of the Subaru Forester. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`228 | ~ 2`016 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Orlando has
|
Subaru Forester has
| |