Chevrolet Orlando 2011 vs Opel Zafira 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 - 163 HP | 94 - 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 176 - 360 NM | 133 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 - 11.6 seconds | 7.8 - 17 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 - 7.9 | 5.2 - 9.6 | |
|
Chevrolet Orlando petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Opel Zafira. On average, Chevrolet Orlando equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Zafira. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Chevrolet Orlando is larger, but slightly lower. Chevrolet Orlando is 18 cm longer than the Opel Zafira, 8 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 458 litres | 140 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1499 litres | 1820 litres | |
| Chevrolet Orlando has 318 litres more trunk space than the Opel Zafira. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Zafira (by 321 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Orlando is 0.2 metres more than that of the Opel Zafira. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`228 | ~ 2`150 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Orlando has
|
Opel Zafira has
| |