Chevrolet Orlando 2011 vs Mazda 5 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 - 163 HP | 115 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 176 - 360 NM | 165 - 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 - 11.6 seconds | 11.2 - 13.7 seconds | |
| In general, Chevrolet Orlando are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Mazda 5. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 - 7.9 | 5.2 - 8.3 | |
|
Chevrolet Orlando petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 5. On average, Chevrolet Orlando equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 5. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Chevrolet Orlando is larger. Chevrolet Orlando is 7 cm longer than the Mazda 5, 13 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Orlando is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 458 litres | 112 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1499 litres | 1597 litres | |
| Chevrolet Orlando has 346 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 5 (by 98 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Orlando is 0.7 metres more than that of the Mazda 5, which means Chevrolet Orlando can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`228 kg | ~ 2`115 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`596 kg | ~ 1`418 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 632 kg | ~ 697 kg | |
| Chevrolet Orlando load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 10 procentiem less than Mazda 5. Therefore, Mazda 5 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Orlando has
|
Mazda 5 has
| |