Chevrolet Orlando 2011 vs Chevrolet Captiva 2006

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Chevrolet Orlando
2011 - 2013
Chevrolet Captiva
2006 - 2011
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Body: Minivan / MPVCrossover / SUV
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engine: 1.4 - 2.02.0 - 3.2
Power: 130 - 163 HP127 - 230 HP
Torque: 176 - 360 NM220 - 320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10 - 11.6 seconds8.8 - 12.2 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!
Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.0 - 7.97.4 - 11.5
Chevrolet Orlando petrol engines consumes on average 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Captiva. On average, Chevrolet Orlando equipped with diesel engines consume 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Captiva. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Length: 4.65 m4.64 m
Width: 1.88 m1.85 m
Height: 1.63 m1.73 m
Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Orlando is 2 cm longer than the Chevrolet Captiva, 2 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Orlando is 9 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 458 litres465 litres
Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Orlando has 7 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Captiva. This could mean that the Chevrolet Orlando uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 11.3 meters11.5 meters
The turning circle of the Chevrolet Orlando is 0.2 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Captiva.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`228~ 2`096
Safety:
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): 60005000
  • higher safety
  • lower price
Contact us: [email protected]