Chevrolet Nubira 2005 vs Skoda Octavia 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Chevrolet Nubira) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Skoda Octavia) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 121 HP | 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 148 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Nubira is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Nubira engine produces 19 HP more power than Skoda Octavia, whereas torque is 132 NM more than Skoda Octavia. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Nubira reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Chevrolet Nubira is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Nubira consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Nubira over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Nubira consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Chevrolet Nubira gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Skoda Octavia 2000 1.6 engine: This is a simple and reliable engine with an impressive lifespan when properly maintained. However, many of its issues stem from air leaks, so checking hoses and the intake manifold is essential. The ignition ... More about Skoda Octavia 2000 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Nubira is 1 cm shorter than the Skoda Octavia, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Nubira is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 404 litres | 548 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1512 litres | |
|
Skoda Octavia has more luggage space. Chevrolet Nubira has 144 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Octavia. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Nubira is 0.4 metres less than that of the Skoda Octavia, which means Chevrolet Nubira can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`330 | 1`805 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Nubira has
|
Skoda Octavia has
| |