Chevrolet Nubira 2005 vs Renault Megane 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 161 NM | 151 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Nubira is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Nubira engine produces 12 HP more power than Renault Megane, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Renault Megane. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Nubira reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Megane is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Nubira consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Nubira could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Nubira consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Renault Megane 2006 1.6 engine: The engine is very robust and long-lived, up to half a million kilometres, and can suffer minor damage, but overall it is quite reliable. Fuel consumption is relatively high for these engines, but they are not particularly demanding on fuel quality.
The most critical ... More about Renault Megane 2006 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.46 m | |
| Chevrolet Nubira and Renault Megane are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 520 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1410 litres | 1600 litres | |
|
Renault Megane has more luggage space. Chevrolet Nubira has 120 litres less trunk space than the Renault Megane. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Megane (by 190 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Nubira is 0.6 metres less than that of the Renault Megane, which means Chevrolet Nubira can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`795 kg | 1`795 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`280 kg | 1`220 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 515 kg | 575 kg | |
| Chevrolet Nubira load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 12 procentiem less than Renault Megane. Therefore, Renault Megane is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Nubira has
|
Renault Megane has
| |