Chevrolet Nubira 2005 vs Volvo V50 2004
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 122 HP | 136 HP | |
Torque: | 161 NM | 340 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
Chevrolet Nubira engine produces 14 HP less power than Volvo V50, whereas torque is 179 NM less than Volvo V50. Despite less power, Chevrolet Nubira reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 5.7 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
The Volvo V50 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Nubira consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Nubira could require 270 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Nubira consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
960 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
720 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
Volvo V50 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.50 m | 4.51 m | |
Width: | 1.72 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.45 m | |
Chevrolet Nubira is smaller. Chevrolet Nubira is 1 cm shorter than the Volvo V50, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Nubira is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 417 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1307 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chevrolet Nubira is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volvo V50. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`193 | 1`850 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 1400 | 2000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Nubira has
|
Volvo V50 has
| |