Chevrolet Nubira 2005 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 98 HP | |
| Torque: | 161 NM | 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Nubira is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Nubira engine produces 24 HP more power than Mitsubishi Lancer, whereas torque is 11 NM more than Mitsubishi Lancer. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Nubira reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Lancer is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Nubira consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Nubira could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Nubira consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Chevrolet Nubira gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Nubira is 2 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Lancer, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 430 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`193 | 1`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Nubira has
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has
| |