Chevrolet Nubira 2005 vs Kia Optima 2005
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 122 HP | 144 HP | |
Torque: | 161 NM | 189 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
Chevrolet Nubira engine produces 22 HP less power than Kia Optima, whereas torque is 28 NM less than Kia Optima. Despite less power, Chevrolet Nubira reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.7 | |
Chevrolet Nubira consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Optima, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Nubira over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 62 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
960 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.50 m | 4.74 m | |
Width: | 1.72 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.48 m | |
Chevrolet Nubira is smaller. Chevrolet Nubira is 24 cm shorter than the Kia Optima, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Nubira is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 496 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 816 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chevrolet Nubira is 1.4 metres less than that of the Kia Optima, which means Chevrolet Nubira can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`193 | 1`960 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 2000 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Nubira has
|
Kia Optima has
| |