Chevrolet Nubira 2005 vs Kia Optima 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 144 HP | |
| Torque: | 161 NM | 189 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Nubira engine produces 22 HP less power than Kia Optima, whereas torque is 28 NM less than Kia Optima. Despite less power, Chevrolet Nubira reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.7 | |
| Chevrolet Nubira consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Optima, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Nubira over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Chevrolet Nubira is smaller. Chevrolet Nubira is 24 cm shorter than the Kia Optima, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Nubira is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 496 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1225 litres | 816 litres | |
| Chevrolet Nubira has 91 litres less trunk space than the Kia Optima. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Nubira (by 409 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Nubira is 1.4 metres less than that of the Kia Optima, which means Chevrolet Nubira can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`695 kg | 1`960 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`210 kg | 1`408 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 485 kg | 552 kg | |
| Chevrolet Nubira load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 14 procentiem less than Kia Optima. Therefore, Kia Optima is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Nubira has
|
Kia Optima has
| |