Chevrolet Nubira 2005 vs Mazda 3 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 161 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Nubira is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Nubira engine produces 17 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 16 NM more than Mazda 3. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Nubira reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 7.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.3 l/100km | 8.7 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Nubira consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Nubira could require 225 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Nubira consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Mazda 3 2006 1.6 engine: This engine is widely regarded as reliable, though it can develop certain issues over time. One of the most common problems is increased oil consumption, often starting after 120,000 km. This is frequently ... More about Mazda 3 2006 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.47 m | |
| Chevrolet Nubira is 1 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Nubira is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 413 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1285 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Nubira is 0.5 metres less than that of the Mazda 3, which means Chevrolet Nubira can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`216 | 1`730 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Nubira has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |