Chevrolet Nubira 2005 vs Kia Optima 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 144 HP | |
| Torque: | 161 NM | 189 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Nubira engine produces 22 HP less power than Kia Optima, whereas torque is 28 NM less than Kia Optima. Despite less power, Chevrolet Nubira reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 8.1 | |
|
The Kia Optima is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Nubira consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Optima, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Nubira could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| Kia Optima gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Chevrolet Nubira is smaller. Chevrolet Nubira is 24 cm shorter than the Kia Optima, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Nubira is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 496 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Nubira is 1.4 metres less than that of the Kia Optima, which means Chevrolet Nubira can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`216 | 1`980 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Nubira has
|
Kia Optima has
| |